In article <elmop-04F86A.17343424052008@nntp1.usenetserver.com>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> In article <blank-00880D.13181324052008@news.telus.net>,
> kenny blankenship <blank@blank.blank> wrote:
>
> > My point, that you're completely missing, is that you are claiming
> > (originally) that once they can, they will *only* cast eighteen to
> > twenty years olds.
>
> I never made such a claim.
>
> Please quote me where I made such a claim.
Not in those exact words no. I paraphrased you.
But since you asked me to quote you...
You wrote:
> They will cast hardbodied 18 year olds and become just another MTV
> show--because their audience will then be the high-spending 18-25
> year olds.
In order to clarify your statement I then asked:
> So what you're saying, is that because they are allowing themselves
> the ability to cast people who are 18 or older instead of 21 or
> older, that they will only cast people who are 18, 19 or 20.
To which you replied:
> They will succumb to that temptation, absolutely--especially if the
> ratings show that to be a success factor.
You said what I claimed you said, QED.
