In article <elmop-12518B.19301121052008@nntp1.usenetserver.com>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> In article <blank-9ADDD0.16255321052008@news.telus.net>,
> kenny blankenship <blank@blank.blank> wrote:
>
> > > Edited to reflect reality ...
> > >
> > > > Approximately 48 semifinalists will then be invited to Los
> > > > Angeles in September for final interviews with Survivor
> > > > producers before roughly 16 finalists most or all selected by
> > > > casting agents to fit the exact criteria we demanded as
> > > > castaways to compete on the show's eighteenth installment.
> >
> > You say that like it's somehow immoral, or wrong. Are you
> > suggesting that the show should cast people by lottery? Seriously,
> > what's wrong with them casting exactly the types of people they
> > want to cast?
>
> They will cast hardbodied 18 year olds and become just another MTV
> show--because their audience will then be the high-spending 18-25
> year olds.
So what you're saying, is that because they are allowing themselves the
ability to cast people who are 18 or older instead of 21 or older, that
they will only cast people who are 18, 19 or 20.
Reality is just a concept to you, isn't it?
But hey, if you don't like the types of people they are casting all you
have to do is not watch the show.
